Topic Archive: Harkin

The Real Costs of Climate and Energy Legislation

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

In the month since the House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act, the conversation about renewable energy and climate change has gotten more intense in Iowa. Letters to the editor and editorials fill the opinion pages on what should be done in the US Senate. Sometimes the Iowa Global Warming Campaign’s work can be frustrating, especially when huge companies like Warren Buffett’s MidAmerican Energy runs a full scale media campaign designed to mislead Iowans about the costs of action, but the experience is rewarding nonetheless. In an unprecedented move, the Iowa Utility Board is accepting public comments on what the American Clean Energy and Security Act will mean for Iowa. I’m not sure that the Iowa Utilities Board should be making a statement on federal climate legislation, but we will be working to get the right answers incorporated in any recommendation the IUB makes.

We know that transitioning to a clean energy economy will create jobs and improve America’s economic security, but that’s not why I came to work here. What good are rock-bottom numbers on your utility bill if it’s not safe for your children to go outside because of scorching temperatures? What good is 7 cents per kilowatt hour coal electricity when our grandchildren will find half of the species on earth have gone extinct? What good is a small utility bill if millions of homeless climate refugees come to our shores? What good are low energy prices when food prices have tripled due to good farmland turning to desert? I realize that these things can be hard to imagine – climate change is a crisis in slow motion – but we have to realistically look at the costs of inaction. The business-as-usual scenario of burning ever increasing amounts of fossil fuels will assuredly doom future generations of Iowans with more climate-induced catastrophes.

I’m tempted to ask “will we let America lose the clean energy race?” but the stakes are higher than that. Delaying strong action on climate change dooms all of the world’s economies, constraining them with violent weather, useless farmland, disease outbreaks, lost natural resources, and rising oceans.

I decided to spend my summer in Iowa because I believe we can change the way we do things for the better. We are not helpless in stopping the effects of climate change. We can take action to reduce our emissions of dangerous greenhouse gases like CO2 and make a more durable energy and transportation infrastructure. The US Senate needs to pass robust energy and climate legislation this year, and I implore Senators Harkin and Grassley to be leaders in making laws that will effectively deal with the problem of climate change.

Drew

Pollution credits are hot issue in climate bill

Monday, July 20th, 2009

Washington, D.C. – Rio Tinto, a mining giant that provides coal for utilities in the United States, is a major producer of the greenhouse gas emissions the Obama administration wants to cap.

But the Australian company is counting on farmers in Iowa and around the globe to help the business avoid making some costly changes in its operations.

Rio Tinto, together with utilities and other polluters, wants to reduce the cost of complying with proposed emission controls by being allowed to purchase “offsets” from farmers and other landowners who have undertaken carbon-saving practices, such as planting trees on their property or reducing their tillage of crop land.

Those credits are a key issue as Congress shapes legislation to reduce U.S. carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050. The House passed a bill in June; the Senate is working on similar legislation.

The polluters are pushing lawmakers to make the terms of the credit-earning programs as liberal as possible, to keep the value of the credits relatively low.

But some environmentalists say that will let the polluters off the hook for making real reductions in their own emissions.

Read the rest of the Des Moines Register article here.

Come Volunteer with the Iowa Global Warming Campaign July 3rd and 4th

Monday, June 29th, 2009

Last Friday the House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy & Security act on a close vote. This legislation promises to jump start our renewable economy, reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, and reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. Now the bill faces a tough battle in the Senate before it can be signed into law by the President.

We are going to keep building the Iowa grassroots pressure for real solutions to climate change. That is why the Iowa Global Warming Campaign will be collecting “declare your independence from fossil fuels” postcards from concert-goers at the 80/35 festival in Des Moines. The postcards will be mailed to our Senators letting them know what the people want. The 80/35 festival will be held July 3rd and 4th at 13th and Locust Avenue. This is a great opportunity to volunteer with the campaign and make a real difference in getting our country off of fossil fuels. At least 15,000 people are expected to attend the concert featuring Public Enemy, Ben Harper, and many others (http://80-35.com/). Send an email to dveysey@iowaglobalwarming.org if you are interested in volunteering!

Drew
dveysey@iowaglobalwarming.org

Green schools bill gets green light

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Forget rose-colored glasses. U.S. Rep. Dave Loebsack is viewing the world through green-tinted lenses.

The Democratic congressman has been wearing the hued goggles since he first introduced his green schools initiative during last Congress. The bill stalled in the Senate at the time.

The reintroduced legislation passed the House 275-155, with 24 Republicans on board, Thursday afternoon.

Loebsack, a member of the House Education and Labor Committee, said he is working with Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, a fellow Democrat, to get the bill passed there. The congressman said he modeled the legislation on a grants program Harkin put in place to help schools modernize.

To read more, go here.

Powershift ‘09

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

It’s been a long week, but now that I’m back from Powershift ‘09, I’m feeling renewed and ready to step up and keep working towards the goals we outlined in D.C. The student climate movement is alive and well, and I think we’re going to see some important changes finally reach the country this coming year.

Before I go too far into detail; For those of you out there who don’t know what “Powershift” is, there’s plenty of information available on the website, with all the details including schedule of events and speakers. As they describe the event themselves, “Power Shift 09 will bring 10,000 young people to Washington to hold our elected officials accountable for rebuilding our economy and reclaiming our future through bold climate and clean energy policy.” Speakers this year included Lisa Jackson (Head of the EPA), Van Jones (Green Jobs Now), Ken Salazar (Secretary of the Interior), Congressman Ed Markey and Congresswoman Donna Edwards, as well as musical performances by The Roots and Santigold.

For those of us traveling from Des Moines, the weekend involved some long-haul driving. I was joined by three freshman students from Drake University and another from Iowa State, and the 17-hour drive flew by in a haze of political and environmental discussion. By the time we reached D.C., I think we had finally figured everything out, but promptly fell asleep on the floor of the convention center and tragically forgot our solutions to the world’s problems before being able to enlighten everyone.

Saturday and Sunday were set aside for workshops and panel discussions during the day, and musical performances and speeches at night. There were over twenty different meetings to choose from for each two-hour block, and though they focused on fascinating things like “Ecopedagogy” and “Bird-Dogging for Change” and “The Road to Copenhagen,” a quick walk around the Washington Convention Center Saturday morning revealed that a good number of the 12,000 students there had also chosen to spend the first few sessions catching up on lost sleep. (Powernap ‘09, you might say) After a restful hour curled up in one of the thousands of corners at the DC Convention Center, I attended a great panel discussion on creative media activism, featuring the likes of Leilani Munter (Celebrity NASCAR driver, the fourth woman to ever race on the circuit and an outspoken environmental activist) and Daryl Hannah, who surprised me by being not only extremely eloquent, but also one of the most well-versed activists at the conference.

Saturday night’s Roots performance was inspirational as well, though in a slightly different vein, and by Sunday afternoon I was feeling far more informed and equipped for the challenges ahead. The students from Iowa had a “Break Out” meeting to discuss Iowa specific issues Sunday night, where we went over the QC Rail project, the Marshalltown coal plant, and the possibility of securing a National Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (and how Iowa would benefit from that.) I met a lot of other committed, interested students from around the state and did some important networking before taking in a short documentary and getting some well-needed sleep. In the morning; it was time to lobby congress.

Monday started off with an extended discussion with a member of Boswell’s staff, who engaged our group of 25 interested students in a lively discussion about things like a carbon cap and renewable energy. He played Devil’s Advocate for much of it, reminding us that Boswell agreed with almost all of our demands, but threw out figures about how weaning our state off of coal would increase electricity bills by 3 fold, a point that we heatedly refused. Later, at a meeting with Harkin’s representative, we were told Harkin would likely continue to spearhead projects in line with our demands. Though I wasn’t able to attend the meetings with Loebsack, Braley, or Latham in full, I heard they had similar outcomes, and in the meeting with King, who has traditionally been opposed to environmental measures in the past, some common ground was found when discussion turned to the potential for the wind industry to help create new jobs.

The most noteworthy meeting of the weekend was with Senator Grassley himself, the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, which was held on Monday afternoon. More than forty students crammed into his meeting room and used our alloted fifteen minutes to the best of our ability. We made our pitch and asked if we could count on him to support a cap-and-trade system in the upcoming year, and received an unclear answer that suggested he wouldn’t. When I asked him if we could count on him to support a renewable energy portfolio standard in the future, he turned to one of his aides and said, “Doesn’t he know I’ve supported the last four RES bills?” A humorous skirting of the question; we never got clear answers from either him or his staff, though they treated us very respectfully.

Overall, it was one of the best weekends I’ve had since coming here. The chance to interact again with other interested and committed students my age was revitalizing, and I’m excited to try and put some of the things I learned to work. If you’re interested in visiting the conference next year or learning more about it, visit their website here